never was and will never be part of India - Intifada
Indian de-mocracy written in blood and betrayal: Indian Express
PANDIT JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
Pandit Nehru, in India´s Parliament (Lok Sabha) on June 26 and August 7, 1952 said:
"I say with all respect to our Constitution that it just does not matter what your Constitution says; if the people of Kashmir do not want it, it will not go there. Because what is the alternative? The alternative is compulsion and coercion...We have fought in good fight about Kashmir on the field of battle... (and) ...in many a chancellery of the world and in the United Nations, but, above all, we have fought this fight in the hearts and minds of men and women of that State of Jammu and Kashmir. Because, ultimately - I say this with all deference to this Parliament - the decision will be made in the hearts and minds of the men and women of Kashmir; neither in this Parliament, nor in the United Nations nor by anybody else."
Pandit Nehru first visited Kashmir in 1940 to lay the foundation stone for the plan to annex Kashmir. He was stopped by the forces of Maharaja Hari Singh at Kohala as the Maharaja had understood the intrigue and knew about the growing influence of Pandit Nehru on Sheikh Abdullah and to stop this Nehru was not allowed to enter Kashmir. Maharaja, in order to retain his supremacy, considered Pandit Nehru a threat and tried to negotiate a standstill agreement with India and Pakistan. India hesitated and rejected the offer but Pakistan accepted this arrangement. Having an ancestral Kashmiri background, Nehru understood Kashmir politics and his fellow white collared Kashmiri Pandits were a great source of information and help at any time in any given situation
Pandit Nehru was quite aware about the future international developments and the questions those might be asked, wanted to legitimize his plans about Kashmir annexation by associating himself with the popular leader of Sheikh Abdullah's stature. Nehru had also taken the Last Viceroy of India, Lord Mountbattan into confidence and made him believe that Kashmir wants to stay with India and that their popular leader is secular in thinking to join "secular" India while rejecting to associate with Muslim Pakistan.
INDIAN POLITICAL CRAFTSMANSHIP
The Indian argument was based on the validity of the Maharajas accession to India and the ratification of the document by Sheikh Abdullah. Both were dispensed with in a very short time to validate occupation by introducing article 370. Indian military might, nuclear arrogance, hegemony and coercion turned Kashmiris into psychological wrecks and no one seems to take the notice. They are punished because they ask freedom from occupation.
From 1953 to 1975, Chief Ministers of Kashmir State had been nominees of Delhi. Their appointment to that post was legitimized by the holding of farcical and totally rigged elections in which the Congress party led by Delhi's nominee were elected by huge majorities.
This authoritative description of a blot on our record which most overlook was written by Pandit B. K. Nehru, who was Governor of Kashmir from 1981 to 1984. in his memoirs published in 1997. Those who cavil at Article 370 of the Indian Constitution and the special status of Kashmir constitutionally ought to remember the special treatment meted out to it politically. Which other State has been subjected to such debasement and humiliation? And, why was this done? It was because New Delhi had second thoughts on Article 370. It could not be abrogated legally. It was reduced to a husk through political fraud and constitutional abuse. The current debate is much more than about restoration of Article 370 by erasing the distortions. It is about redressing a moral wrong.
Article 370 was used freely not only to amend the Constitution of India but also of the State. On July 23, 1975 an Order was made debarring the State legislature from amending the State Constitution on matters in respect of the Governor, the Election Commission and even the composition" of the Upper House, the Legislative Council.
The Attorney General cited Ayyangar's speech only on the India-Pakistan war of 1947, the entanglement with the United Nations and the conditions in the State. On this basis, the court said, in 1968, that the situation that existed when this Article was incorporated in the Constitution has not materially altered, 21 years later. It ignored completely Ayyangar´s exposition of Article 370 itself; fundamentally, that the Constituent Assembly of Kashmir alone had the final say.
Given their record, whenever Kashmir is involved, how can anyone ask Kashmiris to welcome Union institutions (such as the Election Commission) with warmth?
This was a political accord between an individual, however eminent, and the Government, It cannot override Article 370; still less sanctify Constitutional abuse. It bound the Sheikh alone and only until 1977.
The accession of J&K being conditional, Article 370 was introduced to facilitate the terms of J&K's accession. India desperately wanted to prove 2-nation theory wrong and wanted a Muslim majority region under its fold, a Kashmir of strategic significance, and roping in, over ambitious, Sheikh Abdullah for a separate state were the main reasons why India went ahead for accession of J&K. When Instrument of Accession was signed, constitution of India was not ready. As per clause 7 of the Instrument of Accession, J&K was not committed to accept the future Constitution of India.
In November 1949 all the princely states and provincial heads of Indian dominion were supposed to issue proclamations making Constitution of India operative in their respective states and provinces, J&K refused such proclamation referring to the clause 7 of Instrument of Accession. This is because the draft form of constitution refused separate constitutions for the states and J&K always wanted their own separate constitution. There was a legal implication in this situation and the accession issue already challenged involving United Nations. Article 306-A of the draft Constitution of India became article 370 in the actual constitution. Considering the overall situation prevalent, Article 370 was a major step forward at that time. The Article paved the way for India to make several laws and provisions of the Constitution of India applicable to Jammu & Kashmir State beyond the straitjacket of the Instrument of Accession. Besides, Article 370 was conceived as a temporary arrangement, with hopes of a full integration in time to come.
BRITISH TRAINED BUREAUCRAT MENON
Reforms Commissioner to the Viceroy
the transfer of power in India
V.P. (Vapal Pangunni) Menon, Reforms Commissioner, a key official of British Indian Government and honoured with the title of 'Rao Bahadur' had become indispensible. British policy on any constitutional question considered by the Viceroy's administration would not escape his notice and in certian cases policy matters were consummated on the basis of drafts prepared by him. Menon was invaluable as the provider of the fine detail, while unlike so many of his colleagues, not a lawyer by training, his formidable experience and intelligence made him a master draftsman.
Menon known as the British-Indian bureaucrat, privileged to be very close to the top brass of Viceroys, managed to create a clout in the decision making of Government of British-India. The genius hailed from Ottappalam in Kerala, not even passed the eighth standard became an eminent administrator and a diplomat. Last Constitutional Advisor to the Governor-General of British India, and right hand of Sardar Vallabhai Patel the Home Minister of India, immediately after independence. His vision and persevered commitment made it possible for him to extract a controversial ´Instrument of Accession´ from then Maharaja Hari Singh of Kashmir.
It is beyond doubt that the plan to annex Kashmir would not succeed had V P Menon not played the pivotal role being part of the group namely Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Krishna Menon, with above all, the blessings of Lord Mountbatten. After getting the paper signed from Maharaja, V.P.Menon returns to Delhi on Sunday, October 26, 1947 and flashes out the paper before Alexander Symon, Britain's Deputy High Commissioner after pouring each a stiif drink said "the b*****d has signed the paper and now Kashmir is ours."
V.P.Menon finds it hard to comprehend the easy exit of British from India and in his book "The transfer of power in India" makes a mention saying "It was in August 1947 that the British handed over power and left the country. The manner both of their coming and of their going was unique. They came to trade, but stayed to rule. They left of their own free will; there was no war, there was no treaty – an act with no parallel in history."
The world-war second had put a huge financial burden on the British Government and it was very difficult for them to continue their rule over the sub-continent. Prime Minister Attlee was in a desperate hurry to make a quick but smooth exit and he was convinced the job can be handled only by experienced Lord Mountbatten. Prime Minister Atlee wanted to leave India as quickly as possible and it were the circumstances like economic worsening situation of United Kingdom rather than anything else that gave India its freedom.
Menon further says, "Pakistan today is an Islamic State. There is today hardly a Hindu or a Sikh to be found in Western Pakistan. There is no minority problem in West Pakistan; while East Pakistan is being steadily drained of its Hindus. India on the other hand still has a population of about forty million Muslims, besides other minorities, to protect and care for."
"It is never too late for men of goodwill to take stock of realities, for the leaders to sit down calmly and dispassionately and together evolve some common machinery which would merely minimise the rigours of partition but, by banishing all sense of fear and conflict, would bring about for both countries enduring peace and progress."
For Sardar Patel supported by like minded V.P.Menon, M.C.Mahajan and the ilk, the State of Kashmir had become for all time an integral part of Indian Union. The job distribution of political wrangling was carefully thought out and the dirty role was ingeniously handled by resourceful V.P.Menon and M.C.Mahajan. Nehru's initial utterances or commitments were a direct result of Governor-General Lord Mountbatten's developed understanding with Pandit Nehru on the issue and perhaps a pre-condition for supporting airlifting of Indian Army to Srinagar airport.
ARCHIBALD PERCIVAL WAVEL
Field Marshal Archibald Percival Wavell, penultimate Viceroy of India noted that Menon had been presenting a Congress brief and too much reliance was being put on his advice. Private Secretary, George Abell had lost his earlier confidence in Menon and issued a note for Mountbatten's attention "Up to recently V.P.Menon knew everything that was connected with high policy that was going on between the Viceroy and the India Office. Lately he has rather less closely in confidence because he is a Hindu, and is inevitably under pressure from Congress to tell them what is going on…..thus though he is an old friend of mine, and one of the people I like best in Delhi, I am convinced that it is not possible to take him into confidence as fully as has been done in the past."
While Jinnah was putting bits and pieces of newly Pakistan together, he was unaware about the happenings in Kashmir. Mr Menon and the group were busy trying to influence Maharaja Hari Singh to change his mind and agree to join India which he declined many a times and even refused to see Lord Mountbatten who visited Kashmir to persuade Maharaja to save Nehru humiliation. Nehru’s growing influence on Sheikh Abdullah unnerved the Muslim Conference Leaders and out of panic, few of them provided a pretext to Nehru by sending Pathan tribesmen to capture Kashmir by force. The two letters exchanged, within just two days, between Maharaja and Lord Mountbatten is an ample proof to see the pivotal role that V P Menon played to change Maharaja’s mind.
MOHANDAS KARAMCHAND GANDHI
"Mahatma Gandhi has been insisting that freedom would lose its significance if the lot of the common man were not improved. Similarly, the agitation for Pakistan was based upon the need for the Muslims to build up their life in their own way. Neither object can be achieved if the two States’ resources are frittered away in futile military preparations. It is imperative that a way be found for building up a basis of security for both. Public opinion in India will therefore insist upon adequate military precautions on the frontiers of India, and no responsible statesman will be able to ignore the demand. This will naturally lead to counter-preparations on the Pakistan side…."
HIGH COMMISSIONER SRI PRAKASH
American historian Stanley Wolpert, in his book, Partition of India writes "when Jawarhar Lal Nehru was informed of what his high commissioner in Karachi had proposed, he expressed amazement. India´s first high commissioner, Sri Prakash told Lord Mountbatten that for the sake of peace all around, the best thing India could do was to handover Kashmir to Pakistan. "In a sharp letter to Sri Prakash, Nehru wrote, I was amazed that you hinted at Kashmir being handed over to Pakistan....If we did anything of the kind our government would not last many days and there would be no peace....it would lead to war with Pakistan because of public opinion here and of war-like elements coming in control of our policy. We cannot and will not leave Kashmir to its fate....The fact is that Kashmir is of the most vital significance to India..here lies the rub...we have to see this through to the end...Kashmir is going to be a drain on our resources but it is going to be a greater drain on Pakistan."
Wolpert further writes that if Nehru had accepted Gandhi's offer of mediating the Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan, history would have taken a different course. "If Nehru had only listened to Gandhi, inviting him to arbitrate the Kashmir conflict with Jinnah, India and Pakistan might have been spared three wars and the tragic loss of countless lives, at least 50,000 of whom were Kashmiri. "According to Wolpert "Mountbatten's frenzied plans had blinded him (Nehru) to the wretched realities of partition's monstrous problems, the cause of so many deaths and sixty more years at least of fighting and hatred."
Sixty two years after Independence, Dhiraj Nayyar of Indian Express, in its July 01, 2008 issue writes "The curious hybrid that is Indian secularism India’s political parties cynically and repeatedly exploit religion as a means to garner votes. Second, while experience elsewhere in the world suggests that as countries become more prosperous they become less religious and more secular, in India it seems to be the opposite — the affluent tend to be more conservative especially on issues of religion and secularism. So the future of secularism in India hangs in the balance." Nehru's cleverness paid dividends and Indian army landed in Kashmir on October 27, 1947 after tribal invasion from Pakistan. Sheikh Abdullah was sworn in as the first Prime Minister of now Independent Kashmir on March 5, 1948 as he had struck an understanding with Nehru and believed Nehru to keep his promise. It is on record that Pandit Nehru even committed to the people of Kashmir, November 1948, when he delivered a speach in Lal chowk, Srinagar and said "we have only come to help Kashmir to throw infiltrators out and once peace is restored, the Indian army will leave." And they never did.
ARTICLE 370 WHAT IT MEANS
The background makes the meaning of Article 370 clearer still. It was on October 16, 1949, the product of negotiations between Sheikh Abdullah, Afzal Beg, Maulana Masoodi, Moti Ram Bagda, N Gopalaswamy Ayyanger and Nehru. Gopalaswamy Ayyangar gave an authoritative exposition of its terms in the Constituent Assembly: "You will remember that several of these clauses provide for the concurrence of the Government of Jammu and Kashmir State". Gulzari Lal Nanda as India’s Home Minister points out on December 4, 1964, that it would be totally wrong to assume that with the repeal of the Article all constitutional provisions would automatically apply to Kashmir.
Louis Mountbatten of Burma had known the Hindu ruler since they had galloped side by side on the manicured grass of his polo field at Jammu during the Viceroy’s tour with the Prince of Wales, Mountbatten had deliberately arranged his state visit to Hari Singh’s capital Srinagar to force a decision on Kashmir’s future out of its hesitant rule.
[FREEDOM AT MIDNIGHT]
Not that it matters whether ‘article 370’ exists or not, as V P Menon’s brainchild Instrument of Accession’, in connivance with Mehar Chand Mahajan under instructions from, Sardar Vallabhai Patel believed to be unauthentic has made the article irrelevant. With the passage of time, to strengthen and complicate the issue this ‘accession document’ or extension of Article 370 served the purpose as the proponents of IOA played their cards right and now Kashmir ‘Hamara hai’ thought to be a foregone conclusion need not even be discussed but for the purpose of maintaining record let us analyze what it means.
Only two authorities under the article could amend or abrogate it, the President of India and the Constituent Assembly of Jammu & Kashmir. The Assembly ceased to exist after it had enacted the state's Constitution on November 17, 1956, that came into force on January 27, 1957.
"Article 370 was adopted by the Constituent Assembly in 1949 and dubbed in the marginal note as "Temporary" Provisions with respect to the State of Jammu & Kashmir" and figured in Part XXI on "Temporary and Transitional Provisions" There was another reason for its temporary character. In 1949 India was committed to a plebiscite." Plebiscite, as is known, is consigned, for the time being, to dustbin of history and the State's Constituent Assembly stands vanished.
To complicate issue further an impression is created to establish India’s constitutional hold on Kashmir by laying emphasis on centre-state relations restricted to internal autonomy and the only question that could be discussed is restoration of ‘autonomy’ eroded through constitutional amendments from time to time and promoted through services rendered by puppet regimes installed by Government of India. To do all this article 370 was used as a necessary tool.
This infamous article is also used to confuse international community to substantiate the argument that Kashmir State acceded to India on three Union subjects i.e. defense, foreign affairs and communication. The article exempted the state from the provisions of the constitution providing for the governance of the state and the state was allowed to have its own constitution. Again under the article state was restricted to three subjects only and at the same time the President of India could extend to it the other provisions of the Indian constitution and only consultation with the State government was required and could be seen as an exercise of formality as no Kashmir State Government would survive if it did not conform to India’s wishes. The provision of a ratification of State’s Constituent Assembly, for any constitutional amendment from India’s President was never allowed in the real sense. The State’s Constituent Assembly, being an impediment, was done away with precision political maneuvering.
"Now, the provisions of the article relate particularly to matters which are not mentioned in the Instrument of Accession and it is one of our commitments to the people and Government of Kashmir that no such additions should be made except with the consent of the Constituent Assembly which may be called in the State for the purpose of framing its Constitution." This verbal commitment made in the above statement is an ample proof for Sheikh Abdullah and his colleagues being taken for a ride. That is why Sheikh is believed to be inexperienced and a novice in the field of politics.
The engagement of political wrangling through clauses and sub-clauses of Indian constitution and argument about erosion of article 370 slowly and systematically, was used as another tool and a pretext to put a seal on and divert attention from the main issue of fraudulent ´Accession´ and that is the main reason for bringing in ´article 370´ that helped India to hoodwink and confuse local people in general and International community in particular. And if the accession was real and credible where is the need for extra constitutional provision? Further complications were created with ‘accords’ like Nehru-Abdullah Delhi agreement in July 1952 and or Indira-Abdullah Accord of February 1975. These accords were based on necessitated political compulsion or prevailing situation of the State or the sub-continent.
One morning of Dec-Jan 1990, notorious Indian CRPF (Central Reserve Police Force) knock at the door of Abdul Ahad Bhat of Batmaloo, Srinagar and demand the TV set to watch their favourite program Ramayana. The lady of the house opens the door to find uniformed armed infantry men staring at her with the demand and the next minute she collapses and is rushed by her relations to the hospital to be declared dead. In Kashmir incredible India does such miracles on daily basis.
THE KILLING FIELDS OF INDIAN ARMY
Over one million trigger happy armed men in uniform, who do not understand the language, culture, religion, ethos and behaviour, pounce on local population with vengeance and a mindset to eliminate the populace to occupy this rich paradise belonging to the poor inhabitants. It is amazing to find the "GOOD PEOPLE" of the world turning a blind eye to these atrocities committed with impunity. UN can see what happens in Syria, Lybia or Iran but when it comes to Kashmir they look the other way and one wonders why?
More than one hundred thousand men, women and children killed in the last twenty seven years. An independent Kashmir can be a bridge and instrumental between two hostile nuclear nations. Censorship imposed in "Indian democracy" conveniently and with suitability worsens the situations. Indian army makes sure to confine populace behind closed doors as millions on the roads create an embarrassing situation and international community is inclined to ask few questions. Continue to read.......
Be peaceful, be courteous, obey the law, respect everyone, but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to cemetery
Martyr Burhan Wani, the man who rekindled and inspired his people infusing new blood to fight occupiers for the basic right of achieving the cherished goal of independence.
International law says people fighting for self-determination can use force in order to achieve their independence:
The number of gun pellet injury victims, especially youth, mounts to 10298. Men women and children invalid for life.
|PELLET GUN DAMAGE INDISCRIMNATE
Special Director General of Police, Coordination, Law and Order S P Vaid shares information on incidents with Rising Kashmir Reporter Mir Liyaqat Ali.
(December 18, 2016)
DAMAGE BY INDIAN INSTALLED DG VAID
- 5084 people have been arrested
- 500 have been detained under (Public Safety Act)
- 30 schools have been set ablaze in last five months
- 250 to 275 militants operating in the Valley
TIMES OF INDIA (May 21, 2016)
Around 1.8 million of Kashmir´s population show significant amount of mental distress.
THE MESSAGE LOUD & CLEAR
KASHMIR Tweet #kashmir OCCUPIED
Martyr Burhan Wani inspired youth of Kashmir with a realisation that sacrifice is holier and living in bondage and slavery, pusillanimous.
The youth leader Burhan Wani martyred (July 08, 2016) is the last nail in India´ coffin. Burhan made the youth of Kashmir aware of the fact that India does not understand the language of peace.
NEHRU AND ABDULLAH
Sheikh warmly hugs Nehru not realising that he was falling into a trap. Hard memories of the past when in November, 1947 Nehru visited Kashmir and was greeted by Sheikh Abdullah with garlands and very warm hugs and same Mr Nehru ousted him from Prime Ministership and put him behind bars on August 9, 1953 first for eleven years and later externed him from the State. Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad is also seen with a garland but he, it seems, is being ignored by Nehru and the same Mr. Bakshi was installed as Prime Minister after Sheikhs arrest. Kashmiris never considered Nehru to be their leader. Indira Gandhi right behind astutely observing the situation.
Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru were instrumental in playing with destiny of thousands of people killed in the last sixty five years. Winning the confidence of Sheikh, Nehru with the help of trusted Kashmiri Pandits managed to finish off Muslim Conference and replacing it with National Conference as an extension of Indian National Coingress. Nehru, privately and publicly would convince Sheikh for an independent nation of Kashmir and on international level built a basis for Kashmir to be annexed permanently with India. But the international community did not swallow the intrigue and kept the matter alive. The involvement of United Nations Security Council Resolutions became an eyesore and India in desperation flouted all international committments and refused to settle the issue as per the wish of the people of Kashmir.
NEHRU AND EDWINA
Edwina Mountbatten, Pandit Nehru´s friendship cost Kashmiris very dearly, daughter Pamela referred to Nehru as Mamu. Mamu means a maternal uncle and an impression created is that Edwina had some sexual relationship with Nehru. Both the situations can cast aspersion on the character of Nehru. In Nehru's estimation, to reap the harvest of political benefits from Mountbatten, keeping Edwina, Mountabatten´s wife in good stead would be the step in right direction. Nehru focussed his attention spending maximum time serving Lady Edwina and using good relation with her to seek maximum benefits from Mountbatten. A very good move paying good dividends even to grab Kashmir comfortably.
´And of course, her special relationship with Pandit Nehru was very useful for him – ever the pragmatist – because there were moments towards the end of our time in India when the Kashmir problem was extremely difficult. Pandit Nehru was a Kashmiri himself, so he was emotional about the problem. If things were particularly tricky my father would say to my mother, ‘Do try to get Jawaharlal to see that this is terribly important.
Pandit Nehru, India's first Prime Minister, initially, seemed sincere towards Kashmir but the caucus of harldliner Hindu fundamentalist forces around made him think otherwise, in this connection Pandit Nehru, in the Lok Sabha (Parliament) on June 26 and August 7, 1952 said:
"I say with all respect to our Constitution that it just does not matter what your Constitution says; if the people of Kashmir do not want it, it will not go there. Because what is the alternative? The alternative is compulsion and coercion..." "We have fought in good about Kashmir on the field of battle... (and) ...in many a chancellery of the world and in the United Nations, but, above all, we have fought this fight in the hearts and minds of men and women of that State of Jammu and Kashmir. Because, ultimately - I say this with all deference to this Parliament - the decision will be made in the hearts and minds of the men and women of Kashmir; neither in this Parliament, nor in the United Nations nor by anybody else."
In a telegram sent to British Prime Minister Clement Attlee on October 25, 1947 Pandit Nehru wrote:
"I should like to make it clear that question of aiding Kashmir in this emergency is not designed in any way to influence the State to accede to India. Our view which we have repeatedly made public is that the question of accession in any dispute territory or State must be decided in accordance with the wishes of the people and we adhere to this view".
Another telegram sent to Liaqat Ali Khan, first Prime Minister of independent Pakistan on October 31, 1947, Pandit Nehru stated "Our assurance that we shall withdraw our troops from Kashmir as soon as peace and order are restored and leave the decision about the future of the State to the people of the State is not merely a pledge to your government but also to the people of Kashmir and to the world"
A speech delivered on All India Radio on November 2, 1947, Nehru catagorically stated that"We have declared that the fate of Kashmir is ultimately to be decided by the people. That pledge we have given, and the Maharaja has supported it, not only to the people of Jammu & Kashmir, but also to the world. We will not and cannot back out of it. We are prepared when peace and law have been established to have a referendum held under international auspices like the United Nations. We want it to be a fair and just reference to the people and we shall accept their verdict".
In a public meeting in Srinagar (capital city of Kashmir State) on June 4, 1951; Nehru said "Kashmir is not the property of India or Pakistan. It belongs to Kashmiri people. When Kashmir acceded to India we made it clear to the leaders of Kashmir that we would ultimately abide by the verdict of their plebiscite. If they tell us to walk out, I would have no hesitation in quitting Kashmir. We have taken the issue to the UN and given our word of honour for a peaceful solution, as a great nation. We have left the question of a final solution to the people of Kashmir and we are determined to abide by their decision".
In good old days of late fifties and sixties, the Bakshi era, Nehru's dream come true situation. Muhammad Abdullah Tibetbaqal the legendary maestro performing on Santoor in Moghul garden Nishat Bagh. Pandit Nehru enjoying, amongst a visible majority of Pandit community. Maestro playing sufiana music on Santoor reminding the dignitary not to forget and betray his own roots.
NEHRU AND JINNAH
The first Governor General of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, though in chair, had no leverage on his Pakistan army commander-in-chief General Douglas Gracy who preferred to follow orders from his erstwhile British-Indian Viceroy Lord Mountbatten and was in direct liaison with Indian commander-in-chief General Lockhart. Whatever happened vis-a-vis Indian military intervention or Pathan invasion, the British commanders discharged their duties to suit the British interests.
Jinnah labelled Nehru a Peter Pan, a literary figure who should have been an English professor, not a politician, an arrogant Brahmin who covers his Hindu trickiness under a veneer of Western education. [FREEDOM AT MIDNIGHT]
Pandit Nehru hoodwinked Sheikh Abdullah and used his trickiness to make Sheikh believe that he was dealing with an honest statesman politician. Sheikh´s naivety cost Kashmir very dearly and suffered huge loses in men, material, culture and ethos. In May 1946, as leader of National Conference, launched a new slogan ‘Quit Kashmir’ that gave rejuvenated dimensions to the movement and this was the time when Indian struggle for independence was at its peak and emergence of Pakistan was seen as a reality. It seems Abdullah followed a pattern and took a cue from the forerunner leader of Indian independence movement Jawaharlal Nehru who in turn had calculated his infirmities and found him to be an asset in the forthcoming political scene after independence using him successfully to political advantage of India. The changed situation forced him to raise the slogan for an independent Kashmir and after UNO intervention, Dixon plan came to be discussed but again it did not carry on to a logical conclusion as pulls and pressures from Indian lobbies changed Abdullah’s outlook and forced him to make a U-turn on his earlier stand.
Nehru, Gaffar Khan
A sinister conspiracy hatched in early 1940´s by the trio Gandhi, Patel using the services of crafty Pandit Nehru to hoodwink, mesmerise, tall naives Sheikh Abdullah and Khan Gaffar Khan of NWFP to fall into a trap of idealism, secularism and a mirage called "Indian democracy and secularism". The serene environ of Gulmarg, Kashmir was chosen to sedate the credulous and gullible to inflict pain on simmering Baloachistan and Kashmir.
The die cast, Pandit Nehru played a master stroke by enticing tall men Abdullah and Gaffar Khan to give Pakistan measure by measure. The festering wounds Pakistan keeps nursing for the last sixty six years on. Sheikh Abdullah and Gaffar Khan trying to keep pace with the wizard politician who dwarfed them into a couple of beguiled novices. The misled Pukhtoon leader Khan Gaffar Khan, likewise, became another victim of this political expedience.